Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Practice Areas
Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter
Australia-wide · No win, no fee · Free case evaluation — speak to us today
EXPERT HELP FOR PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS
When a professional causes you harm, it can take time to understand what happened — and longer still to realise you may have options. You trusted someone with specialist knowledge. You relied on their advice, their skill, their judgement. And something went wrong.
That kind of harm is disorienting. Many people spend months — sometimes years — believing there is nothing they can do. Often, that is not the case.
Fair Go Australia helps people across all industries understand their rights and, where there is a valid claim, pursue compensation through specialist professional negligence lawyers — on a no-win, no-fee basis, with Australia-wide coverage.
When something goes wrong with a professional you trusted, the aftermath is rarely simple. There is the practical fallout — money lost, health affected, plans derailed. But there is also the disorienting realisation that the person you relied on, the one with the qualifications and the professional standing, let you down.
Most people spend some time thinking it was just bad luck. Or that professionals make mistakes and there is nothing to be done about it. That is not always true — and in many cases, it is not true at all.
Professional negligence is not limited to surgeons or solicitors. It can arise in any industry where a licensed professional owes you a duty of care. Our specialist professional negligence lawyers help people across all of those industries on a no-win, no-fee basis, with Australia-wide coverage.
THE BASICS
Professional negligence occurs when a licensed or qualified professional fails to meet the standard of care expected of a competent person in their field — and that failure causes you measurable loss. To establish a claim, four things generally need to be present: a duty of care owed to you, a breach of that duty, a direct causal link between the breach and your loss, and actual loss that can be quantified.
That legal test does not change depending on which profession is involved. The same framework that applies to a surgeon also applies to a solicitor, a financial advisor, and a structural engineer. What changes is how the standard of care is defined within each industry.
A specialist surgeon is measured against other specialist surgeons. A commercial solicitor is measured against what a competent commercial solicitor would have done in the same circumstances. In every case, the question is not whether something went wrong — it is whether the professional fell below the standard their profession demands. That is the line between an unfortunate outcome and a negligence claim.
COMMON CLAIM CATEGORIES
These are the industries where professional negligence claims most commonly arise in Australia. Each has its own professional standards, regulatory framework, and common failure points — but the underlying legal test is the same across all of them.
Medical professionals carry one of the highest standards of care in Australian law. Misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, surgical errors, failure to refer, and inadequate aftercare can all give rise to a negligence claim — when the error causes harm that a competent practitioner would have avoided. The consequences are often irreversible: a delayed cancer diagnosis allows a treatable condition to progress; a surgical complication that should have been flagged leads to permanent injury.
Example
A patient presents to their GP three times over six months with symptoms that, taken together, point clearly to a serious underlying condition. No referral is made. By the time the correct diagnosis is reached eighteen months later, the condition has advanced to a stage that significantly limits what treatment can achieve.
Solicitors are held to a high professional standard, and when they fall short the consequences for clients can be severe and permanent. Missed court deadlines, negligent settlement advice, errors in property conveyancing, and failure to properly explain an agreement can all constitute solicitor negligence. The particular difficulty is that by the time the problem is apparent, the damage may already be locked in — a missed limitation period cannot be undone.
Example
A client instructs a solicitor to pursue a personal injury claim. The solicitor fails to file proceedings within the applicable limitation period. The claim is extinguished — not because it lacked merit, but because of a procedural failure by the client’s own legal representative.
Financial advisors, stockbrokers, insurance advisors, and mortgage brokers all carry professional obligations under Australian law — including requirements administered by ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). When their advice is unsuitable, incomplete, or driven by undisclosed conflicts of interest, clients can suffer substantial financial loss. The banking royal commission made plain that poor financial advice is far from rare, and its consequences are often most damaging for those approaching retirement.
Example
A financial planner recommends rolling an entire superannuation balance into a self-managed fund and concentrating it in a single high-risk asset class. The planner does not disclose that the recommended products pay a commission. The fund suffers significant losses and the client’s retirement savings are substantially depleted.
Engineers, project managers, certifiers, and construction consultants all carry professional obligations that extend beyond their contractual role. Design defects, structural calculation errors, negligent project oversight, and certification failures can all support a negligence claim where they result in financial loss, property damage, or physical injury. The complexity of the evidence does not make the claim less viable.
Example
A structural engineer certifies a residential building design. A post-construction inspection reveals the foundation does not account for the soil conditions on site. Rectification work is required at significant cost — and that cost, along with any consequential loss, may be recoverable from the engineer.
Accountants and tax advisers are trusted with consequential decisions. Errors in tax structuring, failure to identify audit exposure, SMSF advice that falls outside what regulations permit, and incorrect guidance on business transactions can all result in significant harm — including ATO penalties and interest that compound over time. Many clients do not discover an accounting error until they receive a notice from the Australian Taxation Office.
Example
A tax accountant structures a family trust arrangement incorrectly. The error is not identified for three years. When the ATO reviews the arrangement, the client faces back-taxes, penalties, and interest totalling substantially more than the original liability would have been had the advice been correct.
Real estate agents, property managers, and buyers' advocates are licensed professionals with defined legal obligations. Failure to disclose a material defect, negligent property management that results in damage or financial loss, poor auction advice, and errors in the preparation of contracts can all give rise to claims. A bad outcome is not automatically a bad transaction — if a licensed agent knew something that was not disclosed, there may be a claim worth pursuing.
Example
A property manager fails to arrange required maintenance after repeated notification from the tenant. The property sustains damage that proper maintenance would have prevented. The landlord faces repair costs and an extended vacancy period flowing directly from the property manager’s failure to act.
The industries above represent the most common categories — but they are not exhaustive. Architects, psychologists, valuers, financial planners operating independently, and IT consultants in regulated advisory roles may all owe a duty of care that, if breached, supports a claim. Our experienced legal team works across all professional negligence categories. Australia-wide coverage means neither the profession nor your location is a barrier.
WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES
Whether your claim involves a cardiologist, a conveyancer, or a construction engineer, the elements you need to establish are the same. Australian courts across every state and territory apply a consistent framework.
Did the professional owe you a duty to exercise reasonable care? In most professional relationships this is established simply by the existence of the engagement. A solicitor owes a duty to their client. A doctor owes a duty to their patient. The engagement itself typically creates the obligation.
Did the professional fall below the standard expected of a competent practitioner in their field? This is not a perfect standard — it is measured against what a reasonably skilled professional in the same discipline would have done in the same circumstances.
Did the breach actually cause your loss? This is often the most contested element. An error must be the reason the loss occurred — not merely something that happened around the same time. Courts require a clear, demonstrable causal connection between the professional's failure and the harm suffered.
Did you suffer actual, quantifiable loss? Professional negligence claims are civil claims for compensation. There must be loss that can be identified and assessed — whether financial loss, costs of rectification, loss of earnings, or pain and suffering where applicable.
If those four elements are present in your situation, there is likely a claim worth assessing. A free case evaluation will identify whether they are.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN AUSTRALIA
Every major profession in Australia is governed by a regulatory body with the power to investigate complaints and impose sanctions. AHPRA oversees medical practitioners and allied health professionals. The Law Society in each state — alongside the Legal Services Commissioner — handles complaints about solicitors. ASIC regulates financial services professionals. Engineers Australia sets standards for the engineering profession. CPA Australia and Chartered Accountants ANZ oversee the accounting profession. Real estate licensing and conduct is administered at state level.
What is worth understanding is that regulatory complaints and civil negligence claims are entirely separate processes with separate outcomes. A complaint to a regulator may result in an investigation, conditions on a licence, suspension, or deregistration. It will not result in financial compensation for you.
A civil negligence claim is brought for the specific purpose of recovering the loss you have suffered. The two processes can run simultaneously, and evidence gathered through a regulatory complaint can sometimes be useful in civil proceedings. But one does not depend on the other — and pursuing a complaint is not a precondition for making a legal claim.
Fair Go Australia focuses on civil claims for financial compensation. If a regulatory complaint is also appropriate in your situation, the team can advise on that alongside the legal claim.
TIME LIMITS APPLY
Professional negligence claims in Australia must generally be commenced within 3 years of the date you became aware — or reasonably should have become aware — of the negligence. This period varies by state and claim type. In some states, general limitation periods of up to six years may apply; in others, personal injury claims carry shorter timeframes. Missing the deadline can permanently extinguish your right to claim — regardless of how strong the underlying case may be.
If you are uncertain whether your time is still open, do not delay. Contact our team for a free assessment as soon as possible.
WHY FAIR GO AUSTRALIA
There are plenty of law firms in Australia. Most will take a professional negligence case if it comes through the door. What is rarer is a practice that does nothing else — and has built everything around professional negligence specifically.
Fair Go Australia handles professional negligence claims across all industries — nothing else. That means the team understands how these claims are built, what evidence matters, and where they tend to succeed.
You pay nothing upfront. If the claim is not successful, you owe nothing. The financial risk of pursuing a claim does not compound the loss you have already suffered.
Your location is not a constraint. The experienced legal team can assess and run your claim without requiring in-person attendance — whether you are in a capital city or a regional area.
Not every situation gives rise to a viable claim, and the team will say so clearly if that is the case. A straight answer at the beginning is more useful than optimism that leads nowhere.
Running a medical negligence claim requires different knowledge to running a financial services claim. The team understands the professional standards and evidence requirements specific to each industry.
No commitment, no cost, no obligation to proceed. A clear, honest assessment of whether your situation gives rise to a claim and what the pathway forward looks like. We respond within 1 business day.
TAKE THE FIRST STEP
Many people who come to Fair Go Australia are not certain whether what happened to them qualifies as negligence. That uncertainty is normal — and it is exactly what the evaluation is there to resolve. You do not need to have it figured out before you reach out.
The evaluation is confidential, carries no obligation, and is handled by legal professionals who will give you a straight answer. We respond to all enquiries within 1 business day.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Professional negligence claims can arise in any industry where a licensed, qualified, or regulated professional owes a duty of care. The most common categories are healthcare, legal services, financial services, construction and engineering, accounting, and real estate — but claims can also arise against architects, psychologists, valuers, financial planners, and professionals in other regulated roles. If you are unsure whether your situation involves a regulated professional, a free assessment can clarify that.
Negligence is not the same as a bad outcome. The question is whether the professional fell below the standard expected of a reasonably competent practitioner in their field — and whether that failure caused your loss. A poor investment result is not necessarily negligence. A failed surgery is not necessarily negligence either. But an investment placed without proper assessment of your risk profile may be, and a surgical complication resulting from a failure to follow proper procedure may also be. The distinction requires legal assessment — which is precisely what the free evaluation is for.
Yes — and registration is actually part of what establishes the duty of care. A licensed professional is held to the standard of their profession. If they fall below it and you suffer loss as a result, their registration does not shield them from a civil claim. It also means there is usually professional indemnity insurance in place, which is a significant practical consideration when pursuing compensation.
No. A regulatory complaint and a civil negligence claim are entirely separate processes. You do not need to have lodged a complaint — or received any finding — before commencing a legal claim. In some situations, running both processes in parallel makes sense. In others, a civil claim is the more direct and effective path. We can advise on what approach makes sense for your specific situation.
In most states, the limitation period runs from the date you discovered — or should reasonably have discovered — the negligence. That is typically three years in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, the ACT, and the Northern Territory. Victoria, Western Australia, and Tasmania apply up to six years for general claims, though shorter periods may apply to personal injury matters. The rules are not uniform across all states, and some claim types carry additional complexities. If there is any chance your time may be running, seek advice now rather than later.
This is not uncommon — for example, a solicitor who also gave financial advice, or an accountant who stepped into a financial planning role. It does not prevent a claim and in some circumstances may strengthen it. A professional who holds themselves out as capable of providing services across more than one discipline may owe a duty of care across all of them. The relevant question is what standard applied to the advice or service they actually provided. A specialist assessment will identify which professional obligations were engaged and whether any were breached.
Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Sign up to our newsletter