Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Practice Areas
Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter
Compensation Hub
Losing money because someone you trusted got it wrong is a particular kind of harm. It shows up in your bank account, your super balance, your business revenue, your ability to retire when you planned to. And in most cases, the person responsible carries a professional licence and a duty to protect you from exactly this kind of outcome.
Economic loss is the most commonly claimed form of compensation in professional negligence matters in Australia. If a solicitor, financial adviser, accountant, engineer, or other licensed professional caused you measurable financial harm, you may be entitled to recover that loss through a civil claim.
What is economic loss?
Economic loss refers to measurable financial harm caused by a professional’s failure to meet the required standard of care. It covers money directly lost, income not earned, and financial opportunities not realised — and it does not require physical injury. In Australian courts, it is the most frequently claimed form of compensation in professional negligence matters.
Two types of economic loss
Not all financial loss is treated the same way under Australian law. Courts need to understand what kind of economic loss you suffered and how it connects to the professional’s failure. The distinction matters because it shapes how your claim is built and what evidence will be needed.
Financial harm that flows directly from negligent advice or conduct — with no accompanying physical injury or property damage. A solicitor drafts your will incorrectly and your intended beneficiary receives nothing. A financial adviser places your retirement savings into an unsuitable product and the money is gone. An accountant mishandles a transaction and the ATO comes knocking.
The High Court confirmed in Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 that pure economic loss is recoverable in negligence where a sufficiently close and proximate relationship exists between the professional and the claimant. In professional engagements, that relationship is almost always present.
Financial harm that flows on from some other damage the negligence caused — typically a physical injury or property defect. A medical negligence victim who cannot work during a prolonged recovery. A homeowner whose property is uninhabitable because of a defective building inspection, facing repair costs and lost rental income. A patient whose earning capacity is permanently reduced following a misdiagnosis.
Courts are generally more willing to award consequential economic loss where the connection between the negligence and the financial impact is clearly traceable. These claims also tend to be higher in value — the compounding effect of physical harm and financial loss can be substantial.
Heads of loss
The exact heads of loss will depend on your situation. In professional negligence matters, the following categories come up consistently — and each one requires evidence to establish.
If the professional’s negligence has affected your ability to earn — whether temporarily during recovery or permanently due to ongoing impairment — you can claim for both past income loss and projected future loss. Courts use expert actuarial and economic evidence to calculate future earning capacity. Where the impact on working life has been significant, these awards can be substantial.
Where the negligence affected a business, you may be entitled to recover the revenue or profit that would have been generated but for the professional’s failure. Financial records, projections, and expert accounting evidence are typically required — but lost business profits are a well-established head of loss in Australian professional negligence claims.
Property bought or sold on negligent advice, investment assets lost to unsuitable financial products, and real estate that was fundamentally different from what a negligent valuation or inspection represented. The measure is generally the difference between what you paid and what the asset was actually worth, together with any consequential costs flowing from the error.
Money spent in direct reliance on the professional’s negligent advice — and ultimately thrown away because that advice was wrong — is recoverable as wasted expenditure. Legal fees paid to pursue a matter that was lost due to solicitor error are a common example. So is money spent developing a business strategy based on negligent financial or legal advice that never had a realistic prospect of success.
Where a solicitor’s error — a missed limitation period, a procedural failure, a negligent settlement — has caused you to lose a legal claim you would otherwise have pursued, the compensation reflects the value of that lost claim. Following the High Court’s decision in Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332, courts can award damages for a lost chance even where the outcome was not certain. You need to show there was a real and substantial prospect the original claim would have succeeded.
ATO assessments, regulatory penalties, interest charges, and remediation costs that flow directly from an accountant’s or financial adviser’s negligence are all recoverable. These are often overlooked but can represent a significant portion of the total loss claim.
Where the professional’s failure forced you to engage another professional to fix the problem, incur additional legal costs, or spend money you otherwise would not have needed to spend, those increased costs form part of the economic loss claim.
How courts assess your claim
Establishing that you have lost money is not enough on its own. Courts need to be satisfied — on the evidence — that the professional’s negligence caused that specific loss, that the amount can be calculated with reasonable certainty, and that it falls within a recognised category of recoverable damage.
The foundational question is straightforward: but for the professional’s negligence, would this loss have occurred? If the answer is no — if the loss only happened because of what the professional did or failed to do — causation is established. If the loss would have occurred regardless of the negligence, the claim fails on that head.
Courts assess what you actually lost by comparing your real financial position against where you would have been had the professional done their job properly. The compensation is the gap between those two positions. This requires evidence — financial records, expert reports, and sometimes testimony about what opportunities would have been available.
Not every loss is certain. Sometimes the negligence deprived you of a chance — to sell at the right time, pursue a legal claim, or receive an inheritance. Following Sellars, Australian courts will award damages for a lost chance where there was a real and substantial prospect of a favourable outcome. The award is proportionate to the likelihood of that chance materialising.
In most economic loss claims of any size, expert evidence is essential. Economists, accountants, actuaries, valuers, and financial analysts are regularly engaged to establish both the existence and the quantum of loss. This is not a reason to be deterred — it is a reason to engage specialist lawyers who know how to build this kind of case properly.
Under the Civil Liability Acts across Australian states and territories, courts may apportion liability where more than one party contributed to the loss. If your own conduct contributed — say, if you provided inaccurate information or failed to act on advice you were given — the award may be reduced accordingly.
Real-world scenarios
The following scenarios illustrate how economic loss arises in practice — and the kind of financial harm a specialist professional negligence claim may be able to recover.
A client’s personal injury claim was struck out because their solicitor failed to file proceedings within the applicable limitation period. The original claim had strong prospects. The economic loss is the value of that lost claim — what the client would likely have recovered had the matter proceeded to a successful outcome.
A financial adviser recommended a high-risk investment to a client approaching retirement — wholly unsuitable for someone in their position. The product failed. The economic loss is the difference between the balance they had and the balance they would have held in an appropriate, conservative product.
A small business owner relied on their accountant to correctly structure the sale of a business asset. The transaction was handled incorrectly and the ATO issued a substantial capital gains assessment, together with interest and penalties. The economic loss includes the tax liability, the penalties, and the cost of a second firm to remediate the problem.
A business engaged a solicitor to prepare a service agreement with a major client. The contract contained a critical ambiguity that the counterparty later exploited to exit the arrangement without penalty. The business lost the remainder of the contract value — a material revenue loss over the remaining term.
A buyer commissioned a valuation report before purchasing a commercial property. The report substantially overvalued the asset. The buyer paid the inflated price, operated the property for several years, then sold at a significant loss. The economic loss reflects both the overpayment and the costs of holding an overvalued asset.
A structural engineer approved a design with a defect that only became apparent after construction was complete. Remediation required the building to be vacated. The owner lost rental income during the repair period, incurred substantial remediation costs, and the property’s resale value was permanently affected.
In most Australian states, professional negligence claims must be commenced within 3 years of the date you became aware — or should reasonably have become aware — of the negligence and resulting loss. In some jurisdictions, a longer general limitation period of up to 6 years may apply.
Missing this deadline can permanently extinguish your right to claim, regardless of how strong your case is. If you are uncertain whether your limitation period is still open, contact our team for a free assessment immediately.
Why it matters
Quantifying economic loss is not a job for a general practitioner. The task requires reconstructing what your financial position would have been had the professional performed competently — often years after the fact, often against the active resistance of the professional and their insurer.
Expert evidence is almost always required. Proportionate liability provisions under state Civil Liability Acts add another layer of complexity. And the distinction between recoverable loss and speculative loss — what courts will and won’t compensate — can turn on factual nuances that require experienced legal judgment to identify.
The earlier specialist advice is obtained, the better. Evidence can be preserved, expert reports commissioned, and limitation periods managed before they become a problem rather than after.
If you have suffered financial harm because a professional got it wrong, get an assessment. It is free, it is confidential, and it takes far less time than you probably expect.
Free case evaluation
If a professional’s negligence has caused you measurable financial harm, you may be entitled to recover that loss. Our specialist team offers a free, confidential case evaluation — no obligation, no upfront cost, and no legal fees unless your claim succeeds.
We respond to all enquiries within 1 business day.
Frequently asked questions
Pure economic loss is financial harm that occurs without any accompanying physical injury or property damage — money lost directly through negligent advice or services. Consequential economic loss flows from some other harm the negligence caused, such as lost income during recovery from a medical negligence injury. The distinction affects how your claim is structured and what evidence is needed, but both are recoverable in the right circumstances.
Yes, in many cases. If the professional’s negligence has affected your ability to earn — whether temporarily or permanently — lost income and diminished earning capacity are established heads of loss in Australian professional negligence claims. Courts typically require expert evidence to calculate future income loss, but it is a well-recognised category of recoverable damage.
Courts compare your actual financial position against where you would have been had the professional performed competently. The gap between those two positions is the starting point for quantification. Expert economists, accountants, valuers, and actuaries are regularly engaged to establish the figures. Courts will not award speculative or unproven loss — the claim needs to be grounded in evidence.
Loss of chance refers to the loss of a real and substantial opportunity that the professional’s negligence caused you to miss — the chance to pursue a legal claim, sell an asset at the right time, or receive an inheritance. Following the High Court’s decision in Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994), Australian courts can award damages for a lost chance even where the outcome was not certain. The award is proportionate to the likelihood of the chance materialising.
In most states, you have 3 years from the date you became aware — or should reasonably have become aware — of the negligence and the resulting loss. Some states allow up to 6 years for general claims. These periods can be affected by the specific circumstances of your matter, and exceptions do exist. If you are in any doubt about whether your limitation period is still open, get advice immediately.
Whatever accurately reflects the financial position you would have been in but for the negligence. Financial records, tax returns, bank statements, business accounts, valuations, expert reports, and correspondence with the professional are all commonly used. The more precisely you can document your financial position before and after the negligent act, the stronger the evidentiary foundation for your claim.
Have a question not covered here? Contact our team for a free, confidential evaluation.
Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Sign up to our newsletter