Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Practice Areas
Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter
If you’ve walked out of a courtroom with a result that never should have happened — or received advice from a barrister that turned out to be badly wrong — you already know how devastating that feels. You trusted a trained advocate to fight for you. When that trust is broken through negligence, the consequences can be life-changing.
At Fair Go Australia, we help people across the country pursue barrister negligence claims against the barristers and chambers responsible for their loss.
Barrister negligence occurs when a barrister fails to exercise the standard of skill, care and diligence expected of a competent legal advocate, and that failure causes a client to suffer a quantifiable loss. Unlike solicitors — who manage your overall legal matter and instruct barristers on your behalf — barristers are specialist advocates retained to provide expert advice, draft court documents and represent clients in hearings and trials. They owe a clear duty of care to the clients they represent.
The High Court’s decision in Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 is the foundational authority on professional duty of care in Australia. It established that professionals must exercise the standard of care that a reasonable person with their training and expertise would bring to the task — and that this standard is not diminished simply because the professional holds high qualifications or commands a senior position.
Barrister negligence claims may also engage the duty of care principles recognised under state and territory Civil Liability Acts and, in some commercial contexts, the Australian Consumer Law.
Barristers are engaged for their specialist expertise. When they get it seriously wrong, clients can lose cases they should have won, serve sentences that should never have been imposed, or miss out on settlements that were clearly in their interest. Common examples include:
Incorrect advice on the prospects of a claim or defence — telling a client they have a strong case when the legal position is clearly otherwise, or failing to identify a fatal flaw in the opposing party’s case.
Failure to advise on settlement — not recommending a reasonable offer when it was plainly in the client’s interests to accept it, resulting in a worse outcome at trial or a costs order against the client.
Errors in pleadings or court documents — drafting a statement of claim, defence or other document in a way that fundamentally misrepresents the client’s case or causes procedural complications.
Missing a key argument or failing to bring an interlocutory application — overlooking a legal point, missing the right time to apply for injunctive relief, or failing to have evidence excluded or admitted.
Negligent criminal defence conduct — advising a client to plead guilty to an offence they did not commit, failing to challenge inadmissible evidence, or not presenting mitigating material that could have reduced a sentence.
To bring a successful professional negligence claim against a barrister, you generally need to establish four things:
Your barrister owed you a professional duty of care. This is usually straightforward to establish once a barrister-client relationship is in place — whether the barrister was briefed by your solicitor or retained directly.
The barrister fell below the standard expected of a competent practitioner in their area. This means asking what a reasonably skilled barrister practising in that area of law would have done in those circumstances — not perfect hindsight.
The breach caused your loss. Courts apply the “but-for” test. In litigation contexts, courts may assess causation as a “loss of chance” — you lost a real and substantial chance of a better outcome because of the negligence. The High Court considered this in Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537.
You suffered a real, measurable loss as a result of the breach — a worse judgment, a harsher sentence, wasted legal costs, or a settlement accepted under negligent advice when you could have done significantly better.
Taking action against a barrister is a serious step, but it is a legitimate one. Here is how the process generally works:
The aim of compensation in a barrister negligence claim is to put you in the position you would have been in had the negligence not occurred. Depending on the facts of your case, compensation may include:
Wasted legal costs — fees paid to the negligent barrister and any other costs thrown away as a result of the negligence.
Loss of the value of the underlying claim — the difference between the outcome you received and the outcome you should have received, assessed as the value of the litigation chance you lost.
Costs of remedial proceedings — the cost of subsequent legal action needed to fix the consequences of the barrister’s errors, where that was necessary and reasonable.
Loss of liberty or reputation in criminal matters — where negligent criminal defence advice led to a conviction, excessive sentence or missed opportunity for acquittal.
Consequential financial loss — other losses that flowed directly and foreseeably from the negligence, such as lost income or business losses caused by a wrongly lost commercial dispute.
Every claim is different. What you may be entitled to recover depends entirely on the specific circumstances of your matter.
Time limits are one of the most important aspects of any professional negligence claim. Missing the deadline does not just weaken your case — it can extinguish your right to bring one altogether.
In most Australian states, professional negligence claims are governed by the relevant state Limitation Act, and the general rule is that proceedings must be commenced within 3 years of the date you became aware (or ought reasonably to have become aware) of the negligence. The precise limitation period can vary depending on which state you are in, the nature of your loss, and when it was (or should reasonably have been) discoverable.
Act before time runs out.
In most Australian states, professional negligence claims must generally be commenced within 3 years of the date you became aware (or should reasonably have become aware) of the negligence. Missing this deadline can permanently extinguish your right to claim. Time limits vary by state. If you are unsure whether your limitation period is still open, contact our team for a free assessment as soon as possible.
If you believe your barrister’s conduct fell short of what you deserved, you should not have to navigate that alone. Our team at Fair Go Australia has specialist experience in professional negligence claims, including claims against barristers, and we work on a no-win no-fee basis so cost is not a barrier to finding out where you stand.
Tell us what happened. We will review your situation, give you an honest assessment, and outline your options.
We respond within 1 business day.
✔ No Win No Fee | ✔ Free Evaluation | ✔ Confidential | ✔ Australia-Wide
Specialist focus. We handle professional negligence claims — including claims against barristers — as a core part of what we do. This is not a general practice add-on.
Australia-wide coverage. Wherever you are in the country, our network of experienced legal teams can assist you.
No win, no fee. You do not pay unless your claim succeeds. That is our commitment.
Free initial evaluation. We will assess your circumstances honestly before you commit to anything.
Experienced representation. Our lawyers understand the complexity of running a claim against a member of the Bar, and we have the expertise to take these cases the distance.
Yes, you can. For most of Australia’s legal history, barristers enjoyed a broad protection known as “advocate’s immunity” — a common law rule that prevented clients from suing their barrister for conduct connected to in-court work. That changed significantly following the High Court’s decision in D’Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1, which reconsidered the scope of the immunity. Since then, significant legislative and judicial reforms across multiple states have further narrowed or removed the immunity in various circumstances. In several jurisdictions, advocate’s immunity has been substantially curtailed, meaning that barristers can now be held accountable for a much wider range of negligent conduct than was previously possible. Whether the immunity applies in your situation will depend on the state you are in and the specific conduct involved.
Advocate’s immunity was a common law doctrine that shielded barristers — and in some cases solicitors acting as advocates — from civil liability for conduct related to their work in court, and for work done out of court that was intimately connected with court proceedings. Its rationale was to protect the finality of judicial decisions. Following D’Orta-Ekenaike and subsequent state-level reforms, the immunity has been significantly narrowed across Australia. Some states have abolished it by legislation; others have had its scope cut back through court decisions. The position varies by jurisdiction, and in some states the immunity retains limited application in certain in-court contexts. The practical result is that barrister negligence claims that would once have been blocked may now succeed — and this remains a developing area of law worth exploring with specialist advice.
Barristers and solicitors perform different roles. Solicitors manage your overall legal matter — they correspond with other parties, prepare documents, handle settlements, advise on strategy and brief barristers. Barristers are specialist advocates briefed to provide expert advice and represent clients in court. A solicitor negligence claim might relate to missing a limitation period, giving wrong property advice or failing to follow instructions. A barrister negligence claim is more likely to involve errors in advocacy, incorrect advice on legal prospects, or failures in the conduct of litigation. Historically, advocate’s immunity applied specifically to barristers — though that distinction has narrowed considerably in recent years.
At Fair Go Australia, we act on a no-win no-fee basis for professional negligence claims, including claims against barristers. This means you do not pay our legal fees unless your claim is successful. Your initial case evaluation is entirely free and carries no obligation. If your matter proceeds, we will explain the costs arrangements clearly before you commit to anything, so there are no surprises.
Strong documentation makes a significant difference in professional negligence cases. Useful evidence includes: the brief to counsel and all instructions provided to the barrister; written advice, opinions or memoranda from the barrister; all correspondence between your solicitor and the barrister’s chambers; court documents, judgments and transcripts from the relevant proceedings; fee invoices from the barrister and their chambers; any records of conversations or instructions relevant to the conduct in question; and an independent expert opinion from a senior barrister or practitioner in the same field, assessing whether the conduct fell below the required standard. Do not worry if you do not have all of this to hand — our team can help you identify and gather the records you need as part of the claim process.
If a barrister’s negligence has cost you, let us help you pursue what you’re owed.
Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Sign up to our newsletter