Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Practice Areas
Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter
INDUSTRY NEGLIGENCE
Buying or selling property is one of the most significant financial decisions most Australians will ever make. When the professional you trusted to guide you through that process makes a serious error — and you suffer real financial loss as a result — the consequences can be devastating.
If a conveyancer or property lawyer’s negligence caused your loss, you may have grounds for a claim.
DEFINITION
Property transaction negligence occurs when a solicitor, conveyancer, or other professional engaged to assist with a property transaction fails to meet the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent practitioner — and that failure causes measurable financial loss to their client. It covers errors and omissions in residential purchases, commercial acquisitions, off-the-plan contracts, leases, and property development transactions.
Both solicitors and licensed conveyancers can be liable. Solicitors are qualified lawyers who can advise on the full legal and commercial dimensions of a transaction. Licensed conveyancers are authorised specifically for conveyancing work. Either can be held accountable when their conduct falls short.
The standard applied by courts is the “reasonably competent practitioner” test — what a competent professional in the same position, with the same knowledge, would have done. This test is applied under the relevant Civil Liability Act in each state and territory, and under the broader principles of common law negligence.
A few terms worth understanding:
COMMON EXAMPLES
Not every property transaction that goes wrong involves negligence. But the following situations often do.
Your conveyancer failed to identify a registered encumbrance on the title before you exchanged contracts. You are now unable to develop, sell, or use the property as you intended — and the defect was on the public record all along.
Your solicitor did not advise you that an off-the-plan contract you were about to sign contained a sunset clause allowing the developer to rescind the contract without penalty. You paid a deposit and lost it when the developer exercised that clause.
Your solicitor missed the agreed settlement date due to a failure to lodge documents in time. You were charged penalty interest by the vendor, your finance approval lapsed, and the transaction collapsed entirely.
Your conveyancer conducted inadequate title searches before settlement. Months later, an unregistered third-party interest surfaces, and you are now defending litigation you could not have anticipated.
You purchased a residential property to build a granny flat. Your solicitor failed to identify a drainage easement running across the rear of the block. The planned construction cannot proceed, and the easement was registered on the title throughout.
Your accountant or solicitor provided incorrect advice on stamp duty concessions applicable to your purchase. You relied on that advice, the concession was disallowed, and you now face an unexpected liability to the state revenue authority.
These are not edge cases. They happen regularly — and when they do, the professional’s insurer is often the party who ultimately pays.
DO YOU HAVE A CLAIM?
Before speaking to a lawyer, here is what they will look at. A successful negligence claim requires four elements to be established. Think of it as a practical self-assessment.
ELEMENT 1
The professional owed you a duty of care. In most property transaction cases, this is straightforward — once a solicitor or conveyancer is engaged to act for you, a duty arises. The High Court confirmed the scope of a solicitor’s duty of care in Hawkins v Clayton [1988] HCA 15. In property matters involving advice, Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (1981) 150 CLR 225 is also relevant to how courts assess negligent statements made in a professional context.
ELEMENT 2
The professional’s conduct fell below the standard expected of a reasonably competent practitioner in their field. This is usually assessed by reference to what a competent solicitor or conveyancer would have done — not the best in the field, but a competent one.
ELEMENT 3
The breach directly caused your loss. You need to show that if the professional had acted competently, the transaction would have proceeded differently and your loss would not have occurred. Courts apply the causation test set out in Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537.
ELEMENT 4
You suffered actual financial damage — not just inconvenience or distress. This might be a lost deposit, penalty interest, legal costs to fix a title defect, a diminished property value, or unexpected tax liability.
If you can identify with all four of those elements, there is a real basis to explore further. Our team can assess your circumstances in a free, confidential consultation — with no obligation and no cost.
HOW IT WORKS
The process is more straightforward than most people expect. Here is what typically happens.
Free case evaluation
Submit your circumstances to our team. A specialist will assess whether the four elements of negligence appear to be present, identify the relevant state legislation, and advise on your limitation period.
Document gathering
Your lawyer will work with you to collect the key materials: the contract of sale, title search results, conveyancing file and correspondence, settlement statements, and any communications with the professional after the fact.
Expert review
In more complex matters, an independent expert opinion may be obtained from a senior solicitor or conveyancing specialist. This opinion addresses whether the professional’s conduct met the expected standard.
Letter of demand
In many property negligence cases, a well-drafted letter of demand to the professional’s professional indemnity insurer resolves the matter before proceedings are commenced. Insurers are often motivated to settle meritorious claims early.
Litigation if required
If the matter does not settle, proceedings may be commenced in the relevant Supreme Court or the Federal Court. Our team handles all aspects of the litigation on a no-win, no-fee basis.
WHAT YOU COULD RECOVER
The law’s aim in a successful negligence claim is to restore you — financially — to the position you would have been in had the negligence not occurred. This is known as the compensatory principle.
Depending on your circumstances, recoverable losses may include:
The specific losses recoverable will depend on the facts of your matter. Our team can give you a realistic picture of what may be claimable in your situation during a free evaluation.
TIME LIMITS
In most Australian states and territories, professional negligence claims must be commenced within three years of the date you discovered — or reasonably should have discovered — the negligence. In some states, a longer general limitation period applies.
| State / Territory | Limitation period | Legislation |
|---|---|---|
| NSW | 3 years from discovery | Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) |
| VIC | 6 years general / 3 years personal injury | Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (VIC) |
| QLD | 3 years from discovery | Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (QLD) |
| WA | 6 years general / 3 years personal injury | Limitation Act 2005 (WA) |
| SA | 3 years from discovery | Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA) |
| TAS | 6 years general / 3 years personal injury | Limitation Act 1974 (TAS) |
| ACT | 3 years from discovery | Limitation Act 1985 (ACT) |
| NT | 3 years from discovery | Limitation Act 1981 (NT) |
One point that catches many claimants off guard: the clock does not always start running at settlement. In property transactions, the date of discovery is sometimes much later — for example, when a title defect surfaces after you attempt to sell or develop the property, or when an unexpected tax liability arrives months later. Do not assume you are out of time without getting advice.
In most Australian states, professional negligence claims must be commenced within 3 years of the date you discovered — or should reasonably have discovered — the negligence. For some jurisdictions, a longer 6-year general limitation period may apply. In property transactions, the date of discovery is not always the settlement date — the clock may only begin when a defect or loss becomes apparent. Do not assume you are out of time without getting advice. If your limitation period has already expired, in limited circumstances an extension may be available. Contact our team for a free assessment now.
WHY CHOOSE US
Property transaction negligence sits at the intersection of property law, professional conduct law, and litigation strategy. It is not a field where generalist advice is adequate. Our team focuses exclusively on professional negligence — which means we understand how these claims are investigated, valued, and resolved.
Most practising solicitors and conveyancers are required to hold professional indemnity insurance. In practice, this means that when you pursue a negligence claim against a property professional, you are almost always dealing with a well-resourced insurer on the other side. Experience in negotiating with professional indemnity insurers is not something a general practice lawyer typically has. It matters.
Our service is available across Australia. If you are in a regional area or prefer not to attend in person, we operate fully remotely — with no compromise in the quality of legal support you receive.
We operate on a no-win, no-fee basis for property transaction negligence claims. You do not pay legal fees unless we recover compensation for you. There are no upfront costs and no financial risk in getting an evaluation.
When you contact us, you will receive a response within one business day. If there is a limitation period concern, we will flag it immediately.
✔ No Win No Fee ✔ Free Evaluation ✔ Confidential ✔ Australia-Wide
If a conveyancer or property lawyer’s negligence cost you money, you deserve to know where you stand. Our evaluation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation. Tell us what happened — we will tell you whether there is a claim worth pursuing.
We respond to all enquiries within 1 business day.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Yes. Licensed conveyancers owe a duty of care to their clients and can be held liable under the same negligence principles that apply to solicitors. The Australian Institute of Conveyancers (AIC) sets professional standards for conveyancers in each state, and most conveyancers are required to hold professional indemnity insurance. If their error caused you measurable financial loss, you may have a valid claim regardless of whether they were a solicitor or a licensed conveyancer.
Both can be liable for professional negligence in a property transaction. The distinction lies in the scope of their authority. A solicitor is a qualified lawyer who can advise on the full legal, commercial, and financial dimensions of a transaction. A licensed conveyancer is authorised to handle the mechanics of conveyancing — title searches, transfer documents, settlement — but cannot provide broader legal advice. The relevant professional for your claim will be whoever was engaged and provided the advice or service that fell short.
In most states, three years from the date you discovered — or should have discovered — the negligence. In Victoria, Western Australia, and Tasmania, a longer six-year general limitation period may apply to some claims. Importantly, in property matters the discovery date is not always obvious. If a defect only came to light when you tried to sell or develop the property, your limitation period may not have started when you settled. Get advice before assuming you are out of time.
This is a serious problem. A solicitor acting for both the vendor and the purchaser in the same transaction faces an inherent conflict of interest. Acting in that capacity without proper disclosure and consent may constitute both a professional conduct breach — reportable to the relevant state Law Society — and a basis for a negligence claim if the conflict contributed to your loss. The Legal Profession Uniform Law (applicable in NSW and VIC) and equivalent state legislation address this directly.
In most cases, yes — and this is an important distinction. Solicitors and licensed conveyancers are generally required to hold current professional indemnity insurance as a condition of their practising certificate or licence. This means there is typically a real insurer with real capacity to pay behind the claim. Unlike claims against individuals who may have no assets, claims against property professionals usually have a funded defendant. This makes property transaction negligence claims among the more recoverable types of professional negligence.
Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Sign up to our newsletter