Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Practice Areas
Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter
You paid your premiums. You trusted your broker to get it right. And then, when you needed your insurance the most — it wasn’t there.
Maybe the insurer denied your claim outright. Maybe the payout barely scratched the surface of your actual loss. Maybe you found out, far too late, that your policy had an exclusion nobody ever told you about. Whatever the circumstances, discovering that your insurance has failed you is one of the most gut-wrenching financial experiences a person or business can go through.
Here’s what many people don’t realise: if your broker gave you the wrong advice, placed the wrong policy, or failed to tell you something they should have, that’s not just bad luck — it may be professional negligence. At Fair Go Australia, we specialise exclusively in professional negligence claims, and we help clients hold insurance brokers accountable when their failures cause real loss. Our no-win, no-fee model means you can pursue a claim against your insurance broker without any upfront cost.
A claim against an insurance broker is a legal action brought when a broker’s negligent advice or conduct causes a client to suffer financial loss — typically because the insurance arranged either didn’t respond when needed, or didn’t provide the level of cover the client reasonably expected.
Insurance brokers in Australia aren’t simply middlemen who process paperwork. They are licensed professionals — required under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) — and they owe their clients a genuine duty of care. That duty covers understanding your needs, recommending appropriate cover, placing your policy correctly, advising you on exclusions and gaps, and making sure you know what you’re actually covered for.
This is what distinguishes a broker from an insurance agent. An agent represents the insurer; a broker is supposed to represent you. When a broker falls below the standard a reasonably competent professional would meet, and that failure leads to a loss you couldn’t recover — a professional negligence claim is a legitimate path to compensation.
The legal framework for these claims draws on established Australian negligence principles, including the duty of care for negligent advice confirmed in Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd and applied across Australian courts, alongside the negligent misstatement principles confirmed in San Sebastian Pty Ltd v The Minister (1986) 162 CLR 340. When a professional gives advice, they carry responsibility for getting it right.
It’s also worth knowing that broker conduct can give rise to a parallel claim under s.18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) — the prohibition on misleading or deceptive conduct — which operates alongside, or independently of, a negligence claim. Our team will assess which pathways are open to you.
Broker negligence doesn’t always look the same. It can be a single piece of bad advice, a missed disclosure, or a failure to act at a critical moment. These are the situations we see most often.
You told your broker what you needed cover for. They recommended a policy. But when you made a claim, you discovered the policy simply didn’t cover what you thought it did — because the broker either misunderstood your circumstances or didn’t ask the right questions. A broker’s fundamental obligation is to match the policy to the client, not just place whatever is convenient.
Every policy has exclusions. A competent broker explains the significant ones — especially those likely to affect your specific situation. If your broker placed a policy with a meaningful exclusion that was never mentioned, and that exclusion is exactly what the insurer used to deny your claim, that silence may constitute negligence.
This is devastatingly common, particularly after major property losses. If your broker advised you on an insured value that turned out to be far below the actual cost of replacement or reinstatement, and your payout left you significantly out of pocket, the question is: did the broker take reasonable care in that assessment?
Brokers who manage your renewals carry a responsibility to act on time. If a broker missed a renewal deadline, failed to notify you that your cover was about to expire, or allowed a gap to open up — and a loss occurred during that gap — the consequences can be catastrophic, and the liability for those consequences may rest squarely with the broker.
Business interruption cover became a flashpoint during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it’s a recurring issue in any event that interrupts trade. If a broker failed to advise you on the true scope of your business interruption cover, didn’t flag pandemic exclusions, or placed cover that wouldn’t respond to the kind of event your business actually faced, that failure deserves scrutiny.
Brokers have an obligation to place your policy with a properly authorised insurer. If they placed your cover with an entity not appropriately licensed in Australia — or with an insurer that subsequently became insolvent — your claim may be worthless through no fault of your own.
Businesses often rely on their broker to ensure they have the cover required by law or by contract — professional indemnity, public liability, workers’ compensation. If a broker missed one of these, and a claim arose in the uninsured space, the consequences can be company-ending. The broker’s negligence in that situation is not minor.
Not every bad outcome is someone’s fault. Insurance can fail for reasons that have nothing to do with negligence. But if your broker’s conduct was the reason your coverage fell short, a negligence claim may be open to you. To succeed, you will generally need to establish four things.
Under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), misleading or deceptive conduct by a broker may also give rise to a parallel claim under s.18 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) — operating alongside, or independently of, the negligence claim. Our team will assess which pathways are open to you. If you’re not sure whether your situation meets these thresholds, that’s exactly what our free case evaluation is for.
The process is more straightforward than most people expect — particularly when you have a specialist team managing it.
The goal of a successful negligence claim is to put you back in the position you would have been in if the broker had done their job properly. In practical terms, that means:
One thing worth acknowledging openly: if the court finds that you played some part in your own loss — for example, by failing to read the policy or by not taking reasonable steps to verify your coverage — your damages may be reduced under contributory negligence principles under the applicable Civil Liability Act. We will always give you an honest assessment of this risk upfront.
In most Australian states and territories, professional negligence claims must be commenced within three years of the date you became aware — or reasonably ought to have become aware — of the negligence. This is the date of discoverability rule, and it operates slightly differently from state to state.
In insurance broker claims, the limitation clock often starts running from the moment the insurer formally denies your claim. Most states also impose an ultimate long-stop of 12 years from the date of the negligent act, regardless of when you discovered it.
Missing a limitation deadline doesn’t just weaken your claim — it can extinguish it entirely and permanently. If there is any doubt about whether your window is still open, please don’t delay. Contact our team for a free assessment as soon as possible.
There are general practice firms that will take on a broker negligence claim if it comes through the door. We are not that. Professional negligence is the only area of law we practise — every lawyer in our team, every process we run, every expert we engage, is focused on exactly this kind of claim.
Insurance broker negligence sits within the broader financial services negligence space, and it has its own particular character. You are not just arguing that someone gave bad advice — you are navigating AFSL licensing obligations, ASIC regulatory standards, and the professional indemnity insurance market on the other side of the table. We understand how that insurer thinks and what they respond to, because we deal with them regularly.
Possibly, yes — but the denial itself isn’t enough. What matters is why the claim was denied, and whether your broker’s advice or conduct was the reason that cover wasn’t in place or didn’t respond. If a competent broker would have arranged different cover, disclosed a relevant exclusion, or advised you differently, and that failure caused your claim to fail, a negligence action is likely open to you. The best first step is a free case evaluation to assess your specific circumstances.
An insurance broker must act with the care and skill of a reasonably competent professional in the same position, exercising similar specialisation and operating under the same licensing conditions. Under s.912A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), AFSL holders are required to provide services “efficiently, honestly and fairly.” Falling below that benchmark — whether through poor advice, inadequate investigation of your needs, or failure to disclose material information — can form the basis of a negligence claim.
Proving broker negligence generally requires three things: evidence of what the broker said and did (correspondence, statements of advice, policy documents); an expert opinion from an independent insurance professional on whether the broker’s conduct met the required standard; and evidence linking that conduct to your financial loss. Our legal team handles the investigation and engages the experts — your role is to provide the documentation you have and tell us what happened.
Yes. Insurance brokers holding an AFSL in Australia are required by law to maintain professional indemnity insurance. This is significant for claimants: it means there is typically an insurer behind the broker who will manage and fund the defence of any claim — and who has a commercial interest in resolving meritorious claims efficiently rather than litigating unnecessarily.
Potentially. The limitation period for professional negligence claims in most Australian states runs from the date of discoverability — when you became aware, or ought reasonably to have become aware, of the negligence — not necessarily from the date the negligent act occurred. If you only discovered the broker’s error when your claim was denied, the clock may have started running at that point. However, most states also impose a long-stop of 12 years from the negligent act itself, so the sooner you act the better. Contact us for a free assessment of whether your limitation period remains open.
Yes, and business underinsurance claims are among the most significant broker negligence matters we handle. Businesses often rely entirely on their broker to advise on appropriate insured values, particularly for commercial property, business interruption, and liability cover. Where a broker’s poor advice results in cover that is materially inadequate, and the business suffers a loss that the correct cover would have paid, the shortfall is a recoverable loss. The legal principles are the same — duty, breach, causation, loss — though the quantum in business claims can be substantial.
If your insurance broker’s negligence left you without the cover you were entitled to, you may have a claim. Our specialist team offers a free, confidential case evaluation with no obligation to proceed. No win, no fee — Australia-wide.
We respond within 1 business day — your enquiry is confidential
Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Sign up to our newsletter