For most Australians, taking out a mortgage is the single largest financial commitment they will ever make. You trusted your broker to understand your situation — your income, your debts, your goals — and to find something that genuinely worked for you. Not just something that worked for them.
When that trust is broken — through unsuitable loan placement, undisclosed commissions, or advice that simply was not in your best interests — the consequences don’t stay on paper. They show up in higher repayments you can barely meet, refinancing costs you were never prepared for, or in some cases a default that has left a mark on your credit file for years.
Australian law is clear on this: mortgage brokers carry real legal obligations to their clients. When those obligations are breached, there are genuine pathways to compensation. That’s what we’re here to help you explore.
UNDERSTANDING YOUR CLAIM
Mortgage broker negligence occurs when a licensed broker fails to meet the duty of care and best interests obligations owed to their client — providing unsuitable loan recommendations, withholding material information, or placing clients in products that serve the broker’s interests over their own — resulting in measurable financial loss.
Mortgage brokers in Australia are not simply intermediaries who find you a loan. They are licensed credit representatives operating under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) (NCCP Act), which imposes specific legal duties on how they assess your needs, select products, and disclose their interests. Since January 2021, mortgage brokers have been subject to a statutory best interests duty — a legal obligation to act in your best interests when recommending a credit product, not merely to find you something you technically qualify for.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) oversees licensing and compliance in this space. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) handles formal disputes between brokers and their clients. Both exist because mortgage broker conduct directly affects some of the most consequential financial decisions Australians ever make.
One distinction matters here: not every bad outcome is negligence. If you entered a sensible loan and interest rates subsequently rose, that is market risk — not broker failure. But if your broker placed you in a product that did not fit your circumstances, failed to disclose a commission arrangement that influenced their recommendation, or simply disregarded your stated needs, the position is very different.
REAL SITUATIONS
These are not hypothetical situations. They reflect the kinds of failures that have been the subject of AFCA determinations and court proceedings across Australia.
ELIGIBILITY
Most people who contact us are not certain whether what happened to them crosses the legal threshold. That is entirely normal — and it is precisely why the free evaluation exists. But four questions will help you assess your position before you reach out.
If you can say yes to all four, there is a genuine possibility your situation supports a professional negligence claim. Our team will assess the specifics and give you a straight answer. Use our free eligibility checker, or contact us directly for a case evaluation.
THE PROCESS
The process is more straightforward than most people expect. Here is what it looks like from start to finish.
WHAT YOU MAY RECOVER
The starting point under Australian law is the restoration principle: compensation should put you back in the financial position you would have been in had the broker done their job properly. The High Court affirmed the importance of this approach in Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 — a foundational authority on how damages are assessed in cases involving negligent financial advice.
What that looks like in practice depends on your specific circumstances. In mortgage broker negligence claims, recoverable losses may include excess interest and fees paid on an unsuitable loan, the cost of refinancing out of the negligently recommended product, default penalties and associated legal costs, credit file repair costs, and consequential financial losses that flow directly from the broker’s failure. Where the negligence has caused you to lose property or a significant financial opportunity, those losses may also be recoverable.
We will not give you a figure before we have reviewed your situation — that would not be responsible or accurate. What we can say is that where the four elements of a claim align, the compensation available often reflects years of financial disadvantage. That is worth pursuing properly.
DON’T LOSE YOUR RIGHT TO CLAIM
In most Australian states, professional negligence claims against mortgage brokers must be commenced within 3 years from the date you became aware — or should reasonably have become aware — of the negligent advice or conduct. Some states allow longer periods for general property and contract claims, but the 3-year discovery rule is the benchmark in most circumstances.
Missing this deadline can permanently extinguish your right to claim, regardless of how strong your case is on the merits. If you are uncertain whether your limitation period is still open, contact our team for a free assessment now — not next week.
WHY US
We work exclusively in professional negligence. Not personal injury, not family law, not general litigation. Professional negligence is what we do — which means we understand how mortgage brokers are regulated, how their obligations operate under the NCCP Act, and where the legal pressure points are in claims like yours.’
We are always on the claimant’s side. We don’t act for lenders, we don’t act for insurers, and we don’t act for brokers. Every person who comes to Fair Go Australia has been failed by someone they trusted. That shapes how we approach every case.
There is no upfront cost to pursue a claim through us. We work on a no-win, no-fee basis — you pay nothing unless your claim succeeds. The initial evaluation is free, completely confidential, and carries no obligation.
We assist clients right across Australia. Whether you are in Sydney, regional Queensland, or somewhere in Western Australia, you don’t need to be near a capital city to access specialist help. Everything can be handled remotely.
We know this regulatory landscape — ASIC’s licensing framework, the AFCA complaints process, the obligations that have applied to brokers since the NCCP Act came into force, and how courts assess these claims. That knowledge matters when you are building a case that has to hold up.
Free evaluation. No win, no fee. Completely confidential. Australia-wide.
We respond to all enquiries within 1 business day.
FAQS
Yes. Mortgage brokers in Australia owe their clients a duty of care under common law and are subject to statutory obligations under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth), including the best interests duty that has applied since January 2021. If a broker’s conduct falls below the required standard and you’ve suffered measurable financial loss as a result, you may have grounds for a professional negligence claim. The appropriate forum — AFCA, state Supreme Court, or Federal Court — depends on the nature and value of the claim.
The best interests duty is a statutory obligation that took effect in January 2021 under reforms to the NCCP Act. It requires mortgage brokers to act in their client’s best interests when providing credit assistance — meaning the recommended loan must genuinely suit the client’s needs and circumstances, not simply be available or generate the highest commission for the broker. Brokers must document their reasoning and be able to demonstrate compliance. Failing to meet this duty can support both a civil negligence claim and regulatory action by ASIC.
You’ll need to show that the broker’s conduct fell below the standard a reasonably competent mortgage broker would have applied, and that this failure caused your measurable loss. Evidence that matters includes the broker’s written recommendation or credit proposal, commission and fee disclosure documents, records of what you communicated to the broker about your needs, and documentation comparing the recommended product with available alternatives. The broker’s own loan file is often the most important piece — and we can assist you in accessing it through formal processes if needed.
It depends on your situation. AFCA is the external dispute resolution scheme for mortgage brokers and has the advantage of being free to use, but it has limits — particularly on the complexity and size of claims it can handle effectively. For straightforward disputes, AFCA can be a useful first step. For significant financial losses or complex claims, engaging a specialist lawyer from the outset generally produces better outcomes. We will advise you on the right pathway once we understand your circumstances.
In most Australian states, the limitation period for professional negligence claims runs from the date you discovered — or should reasonably have discovered — the negligent conduct. This is typically 3 years from discovery, though some states allow longer periods for certain claim types. The critical point is that the clock does not necessarily start from when you entered the loan — it starts from when you became aware, or should have become aware, that something was wrong. If you are in any doubt, get advice now rather than waiting.
A broker closing their business does not necessarily end your options. Under the NCCP Act, mortgage brokers are required to hold professional indemnity insurance as a condition of holding an Australian Credit Licence. That insurance may still respond to a valid claim even if the broker has since ceased operating. We will investigate the position and advise you on available recovery pathways, including whether a direct claim against the insurer is viable in your circumstances.
In most cases, yes — ASIC requires mortgage brokers to maintain professional indemnity insurance as a licensing condition, and that insurance is specifically designed to cover valid negligence claims brought by clients. Whether it responds in your particular situation depends on the policy terms, the nature of the conduct alleged, and whether the broker correctly notified the insurer of the potential claim. We work through these issues as part of the claims process and can advise you on the likelihood of insurer engagement.