Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Practice Areas
Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter
If you've ended up here, something has probably gone wrong with a lawyer you trusted. Maybe they missed a critical deadline. Maybe they gave you advice that turned out to be badly wrong — and you're still dealing with the consequences. Maybe you've tried to raise it with them and felt dismissed.
Whatever brought you to this page, you're asking the right questions. Understanding how the Legal Services Commissioner fits into the picture — and where its limits are — is one of the first things worth getting clear.
The Legal Services Commissioner is an independent statutory officer responsible for receiving, investigating, and resolving complaints about legal practitioners in Australia — including solicitors and barristers. It is a regulatory body. It is not a court, and it is not a mechanism for financial recovery. A civil negligence claim is a separate process — and for most people who have suffered real loss, it is the more important one.
The Legal Services Commissioner — or its equivalent in your state — is a government-appointed officer who exists to hold the legal profession accountable for conduct and service failures.
It operates independently of the law firms and legal associations it oversees. Its job is to look at complaints from the public about how legal practitioners have behaved — whether that is charging excessive fees, mishandling client funds, failing to communicate, or engaging in outright misconduct.
What it is not: a body that compensates you for the loss your lawyer caused. If your solicitor’s negligence cost you your case, your property, or years of your life, the Commissioner can investigate their conduct — but it cannot give you that money back. That is what a professional negligence claim is designed to do.
There is also no single national Legal Services Commissioner. The role exists at state and territory level, with different names and slightly different powers depending on where you are.
The name changes depending on your state, but the core function is consistent across the country.
| State / Territory | Body | Governing legislation |
|---|---|---|
| NSW | Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC) | Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) |
| VIC | Victorian Legal Services Board + Commissioner (VLSB+C) | Legal Profession Uniform Law (VIC) |
| QLD | Legal Services Commission | Legal Profession Act 2007 (QLD) |
| WA | Legal Profession Complaints Committee | Legal Profession Act 2008 (WA) |
| SA | Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner | Legal Practitioners Act 1981 (SA) |
| TAS | Legal Profession Board of Tasmania | Legal Profession Act 2007 (TAS) |
| ACT | Legal Services Commissioner | Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT) |
| NT | Law Society NT (complaints function) | Legal Profession Act 2006 (NT) |
NSW and Victoria have moved to a harmonised framework under the Legal Profession Uniform Law, which applies consistently across both states. The remaining states and territories each operate under their own legislative framework, though the practical process for lodging and investigating complaints is broadly similar.
People often assume the Commissioner has broad powers to fix whatever went wrong. In reality, the role is more focused — and more limited — than that.
This is probably the most important section on this page — because the confusion between these two processes leads a lot of people down the wrong path.
A complaint to the Legal Services Commissioner is a regulatory process. You are telling the government body that a legal practitioner behaved poorly or failed to provide adequate service. If the investigation finds merit, the practitioner might be disciplined, warned, or required to reduce their fees. That is the extent of it.
A professional negligence claim is a civil legal proceeding. You are pursuing the practitioner for the harm they caused you. The goal is financial recovery — to be put back, as far as money can, in the position you would have been in had the negligence not occurred.
The High Court’s decision in Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 established that professionals — including legal practitioners — are held to a defined standard of care, and that a failure to meet that standard gives rise to civil liability. That liability is enforced through the courts, not through a regulatory body.
The two processes are not mutually exclusive. You can lodge a complaint with the LSC and pursue a civil negligence claim at the same time. One critical point: the LSC complaint process does not pause your limitation period. The clock on your negligence claim keeps running regardless of whether a complaint is underway.
A complaint to the LSC may be warranted — but if your lawyer’s negligence caused you financial loss, it is unlikely to be enough on its own. A civil negligence claim is the process designed to recover what you’ve lost.
If you want to lodge a complaint, the process is broadly consistent across states.
A civil negligence claim becomes the right pathway — or an important additional one — in these situations.
To establish a professional negligence claim against a solicitor, four elements generally need to be satisfied: the practitioner owed you a duty of care, they breached that duty by falling below the standard of a competent solicitor, that breach caused your loss, and you suffered actual, measurable loss as a result.
Fair Go Australia works exclusively in professional negligence — which includes negligence by legal practitioners. Our network of specialist lawyers understands both the regulatory landscape and the civil claims process, and can help you work out which pathway — or combination of pathways — is right for your situation.
If you have been harmed by a solicitor’s error or omission, the worst thing you can do is wait. The limitation period is running. A free case evaluation costs you nothing and carries no obligation.
The Legal Services Commissioner is an independent statutory officer who receives and investigates complaints about legal practitioners — solicitors and barristers — in each state and territory. The Commissioner can investigate conduct, mediate disputes over costs and service, and refer serious matters to disciplinary tribunals. It operates at state and territory level; there is no single national body, though NSW and Victoria share a harmonised framework under the Legal Profession Uniform Law.
No. The Legal Services Commissioner cannot award compensation for financial loss caused by a practitioner’s negligence. The Commissioner can recommend costs adjustments in limited circumstances, but financial recovery for negligence requires a separate civil claim. If your lawyer’s error caused you measurable loss, a professional negligence claim — not the complaints process — is the mechanism designed to address that.
An LSC complaint is a regulatory process — it may result in the practitioner being disciplined, but it does not compensate you. A professional negligence claim is a civil proceeding that seeks financial recovery for the harm caused. The two processes address different things, operate independently, and can run at the same time. For people who have suffered real financial loss, the civil claim is usually the more important of the two.
Identify the correct complaints body for your state using the reference table on this page, then gather your documentation — retainer agreement, correspondence, invoices, and evidence of the conduct in question. Most bodies accept complaints online. The process involves an assessment of jurisdiction, investigation, and a range of possible outcomes including mediation, tribunal referral, or dismissal. Outcomes depend heavily on the nature and strength of the complaint.
Yes. The two processes are independent of each other and can run simultaneously. Many people pursue both — the complaint addresses the practitioner’s conduct, while the civil claim seeks financial recovery. The important thing to know is that lodging an LSC complaint does not pause your limitation period for the negligence claim. Both timelines run concurrently, so if you are considering a civil claim, do not delay.
A dismissal by the LSC does not prevent you from pursuing a professional negligence claim through the courts. The two processes operate separately. If your complaint was dismissed but you suffered real financial loss as a result of the practitioner’s conduct, a civil claim may still be available to you — subject to the relevant limitation period. Speaking with a specialist negligence lawyer is the best way to assess your options.
Legal disclaimer: The information on this page is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. It is intended as an educational resource only. If you believe you may have a professional negligence claim, you should seek independent legal advice. Fair Go Australia connects individuals with specialist professional negligence lawyers across Australia.
Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Sign up to our newsletter