Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Practice Areas
Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter
Australia-wide · No win, no fee · Free case evaluation — speak to us today
compliance hub
When you place your trust in a professional — a doctor, a lawyer, an accountant, a financial advisor — you have every right to expect that they will do their job competently and honestly. That expectation is not just reasonable; it is backed by law.
In Australia, professionals are legally required to meet defined standards of care and conduct. When they fall short of those standards and that failure causes you harm, it is called professional negligence. This hub explains your rights clearly and without jargon.
No win, no fee
Free evaluation
Confidential
Australia-wide
Understanding your rights
In the context of professional negligence, compliance refers to a professional’s legal obligation to meet the standard of care required by their profession, their regulatory body, and the law. A professional ‘complies’ when their conduct meets the level expected of a competent practitioner in the same field. When they fall below that standard and you suffer loss as a result, they have — in legal terms — breached their duty of care.
Compliance has two distinct dimensions that do not always overlap. The first is regulatory compliance — the rules and codes of conduct imposed by licensing bodies. The second is legal compliance — the obligations actionable in a court of negligence. A disciplinary finding by a regulator does not automatically mean they owe you compensation. Only a court can award damages. These are two separate tracks, and understanding which is relevant to your situation matters.
Courts ask a straightforward question: what would a reasonably competent professional, in the same field and the same circumstances, have done? If the defendant fell below that benchmark, they have breached their duty. The standard shifts depending on the profession — a specialist surgeon is held to a higher standard than a general practitioner in their area of specialty. The law meets professionals where they are, but it expects them to actually be there.
A professional who has been reprimanded by their regulatory body has not necessarily been found legally liable in negligence. The regulator deals with professional standards and disciplinary outcomes. The court deals with financial accountability.
If you want compensation for the loss you have suffered — not just a reprimand on someone’s professional record — you need a negligence claim. A disciplinary finding may support your case by providing evidence of the breach, but only a court can award damages.
Australian law
Australia does not have a single national professional negligence statute. The law is primarily state and territory-based, with a patchwork of Civil Liability Acts supplemented by national legislation in specific sectors. The relevant Acts by jurisdiction are:
| State / Territory | Primary Legislation | Limitation Period |
|---|---|---|
| NSW | Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) | 3 years from discovery |
| VIC | Wrongs Act 1958 (VIC) | 6 years general / 3 years personal injury |
| QLD | Civil Liability Act 2003 (QLD) | 3 years from discovery |
| WA | Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA) | 6 years general / 3 years personal injury |
| SA | Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA) | 3 years from discovery |
| TAS | Civil Liability Act 2002 (TAS) | 6 years general / 3 years personal injury |
| ACT | Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) | 3 years from discovery |
| NT | Personal Injuries (Liabilities and Damages) Act 2003 (NT) | 3 years from discovery |
Alongside these state Acts, the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) under section 60 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) applies nationally — professional services must be rendered with due care and skill. The Legal Profession Uniform Law applies to solicitors in NSW and VIC, governing costs disclosure, conflicts of interest, and professional conduct.
Our areas of practice
Different professions carry different compliance obligations. Here is an overview of the key frameworks for the main categories of professional negligence claims.
Fiduciary duties, duty to advise on limitation periods, costs disclosure, and the Legal Profession Uniform Law. Regulated by the relevant state Law Society.
Duty of disclosure established in Rogers v Whitaker (1992). Regulated by AHPRA. A complaint to AHPRA and a negligence claim are separate pathways.
Obligations under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) and CPA Australia / CA ANZ professional standards. Regulated by the Tax Practitioners Board.
Best interests duty under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Regulated by ASIC. Strengthened significantly following the Hayne Royal Commission.
Engineers Australia Code of Ethics. State-based registration applies in QLD and increasingly elsewhere. Commonly involves design failures and construction defects.
Responsible lending obligations under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth). Best interests duty applies. External dispute resolution through AFCA.
The four-element test
To succeed in a professional negligence claim, all four elements below must be established. This is the framework courts apply under the Civil Liability Acts, drawing on decades of Australian case law including the High Court’s decision in Rogers v Whitaker (1992) and Sullivan v Moody (2001).
The professional owed you a legal obligation. In most professional relationships — solicitor and client, doctor and patient, advisor and client — this is almost always present.
Their conduct fell below the standard a competent professional in the same field would have met. Most Civil Liability Acts apply the ‘peer professional standard’ test.
The breach actually caused your loss — not just coincided with it. The primary test is the ‘but for’ test: but for the defendant’s breach, would you have suffered the loss?
You suffered a real financial, physical, or reputational consequence as a result. Courts require measurable, concrete harm — not merely a bad experience.
Who regulates the regulators
Key distinction
No. A regulatory complaint asks a professional body to investigate whether the practitioner breached their professional obligations. Outcomes — reprimands, suspension, deregistration — are about professional accountability.
A civil negligence claim is the only mechanism through which you can recover the money you have lost. The two processes can — and often should — run in parallel.
Get a free evaluationIn most Australian states, professional negligence claims must be commenced within three years of the date you became aware — or should reasonably have been aware — of the negligence. Some states allow longer for general economic loss; some apply shorter periods. Missing the deadline can permanently extinguish your right to claim, regardless of how strong your case is.
Get a free, no-obligation assessment →Deep-dive resources
Our compliance hub covers the full landscape of professional negligence compliance in Australia. Use the resources below to explore the topic in depth.
Professional negligence is all we do. Every lawyer here works exclusively in this area — not wills, not conveyancing, not family law. That focus means we know it deeply, and it shows in the way we approach each claim.
We operate on a no-win, no-fee basis. If your claim doesn’t succeed, you don’t pay our legal fees. We made that commitment because we know the people who come to us have often already lost money. They shouldn’t have to take on further financial risk just to access justice.
We work with clients in every state and territory. Whether you’re in a capital city or a regional area, we can help — and you don’t need to come to us in person.
We respond to all enquiries within 1 business day.
Common questions
In the professional negligence context, compliance refers to a professional’s legal obligation to meet the standard of care required by their profession, their regulatory body, and the applicable legislation. A professional complies when their conduct meets the level expected of a reasonably competent practitioner in the same field and circumstances. When they fall below that standard and you suffer measurable loss as a direct result, you may have grounds for a professional negligence claim.
Compliance obligations vary by profession and jurisdiction, but at their core they require professionals to exercise reasonable competence and skill. They must follow any relevant professional code of conduct imposed by their licensing body — AHPRA for medical practitioners, the Law Society for solicitors, ASIC for financial advisors — and comply with the applicable state Civil Liability Act and the Australian Consumer Law.
A breach of a professional code of conduct is relevant to a negligence claim and can be strong evidence of a breach of the legal duty of care. However, a regulatory breach alone is not sufficient. You still need to prove all four elements of a negligence claim: duty of care, breach, causation, and actual quantifiable loss.
This is rarely straightforward to assess without specialist advice. Professional negligence cases almost always require independent expert evidence from a practitioner in the same field. If you suspect that a professional made an error that harmed you, a free case evaluation is the best first step — we can assess the initial merits without obligation.
No — and this distinction matters enormously. A regulatory complaint results in disciplinary outcomes: reprimands, additional training, suspension, or deregistration. It does not result in financial compensation. A civil negligence claim is the mechanism through which you recover what you have lost. Both processes can run in parallel, and a disciplinary finding can support your negligence case as evidence of breach.
Our goal is to help people in the best way possible. this is a basic principle in every case and cause for success. contact us today for a free consultation.
Sign up to our newsletter